Ad serving at risk
Ads have not been affected yet, but there is a date to fix it. It is the best time to act.
Use case · Policy violation
The warning usually shows one or two pages, but the problem almost always repeats on others. This guide shows how to read the Policy center, find the cause across the whole site, fix it and request the review the right way.
What the warning means
The Policy center separates three types of warning. Policy issues happen when the site does not follow the program policies, and must be fixed for ads to return. Regulatory issues come from the laws of a country or region, such as the GDPR, and do not require a fix from you. Advertiser preferences appear when advertisers avoid certain content or placement, and reduce demand.
This guide deals with the first type, the policy violation. It can apply to a few pages or to the whole site. The wider the reach, the bigger the impact on revenue.
The most important point: the problem detail shows what was found, but does not replace a check of the whole site. If a page was flagged for low-value content, it is likely that others using the same template have the same problem.
Severity
The AdSense Policy center shows the effect of the problem on ad serving.
Ads have not been affected yet, but there is a date to fix it. It is the best time to act.
Only some advertisers can bid. Ads continue, but demand and revenue drop.
All ads are blocked on the site. It is the most serious measure and should be handled first.
The measure applies to specific URLs. You can filter by the location of the problem and request a batch review.
Step by step
Frequent causes
All of them are described in Google's publisher and ad placement policies.
Google does not allow ads on screens with more ad or paid material than publisher content.
Thank-you, exit or error pages, without real content, cannot receive Google ads.
The policy says not to place ads on automatically generated content without manual review or curation.
Navigation buttons, download buttons and players near the ad generate accidental clicks, and that can trigger a notice even without intent.
Labels such as resources or useful links are prohibited. Only labels such as advertisements or sponsored links are accepted.
Reloading the page or an ad block without the visitor asking is prohibited by the placement rules.
Two exits
Google accepts both paths. The choice depends on how much the site depends on that page.
You adjust the content or layout and ask Google to check again.
You take the ads off the page or the site and do not need a review.
In the review request
The review is your chance to show the problem is really gone.
In practice
The warning cited a single job post. The owner fixed that post, requested a review and was rejected twice.
The audit showed that the same Ad Inserter block placed a banner stuck to the next-page button on every post in the series. The block was adjusted once.
Google showed one example, but the problem was in the template. When the fix was made at the source, all the pages changed together, and the new review request was made with the whole task list marked.
In ConsentMode
No. It shows what the review processes detected, on sites that made ad requests in the last 7 to 10 days. Not appearing there does not mean the site is in good standing.
The warning only goes away after you request the review and it is approved. Fixing without requesting is not enough.
When the site has been rejected several times recently, the button stays inactive until a date shown on the page itself.
They are not mandatory, but they change the type of ads or restrict serving in some regions. It is worth understanding the cause.
No. The audit reads the site and explains what to fix. The review request is made by you, in your account.
Library
This guide was written from these official pages. Read them directly at the source:
The audit reads the whole site and shows all the pages with the same problem, with a screenshot and a path to fix.